Deprecated API
Contents
- Terminally Deprecated
- Interfaces
- Classes
- Enum Classes
- Exception Classes
- Annotation Interfaces
- Fields
- Methods
- Constructors
- Enum Constants
-
ElementDescription- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- 3.11.0 - [#7258] - This part of the
VisitListener
SPI is deprecated. There are currently no plans of replacing it. Please get in touch if you think this functionality needs to be kept in one way or another: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/7258- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- 3.14.0 - [#9911] - This method is no longer supported.- 3.14.0 - [#9911] - This method is no longer supported.- 3.14.0 - [#9911] - This method is no longer supported.- 2.6.0 [#1881] - This type will be removed from the public API, soon. Its methods will be pushed down into extending interfaces. Do not reference this type directly.- 2.0.5 - UseConfiguration.settings()
instead- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#10317] - 3.14.0 - Do not reuse this method. It will be removed without replacement.- [#10317] - 3.14.0 - Do not reuse this method. It will be removed without replacement.- 3.10.0 - [#4990] - Use any ofDSL.name(String)
,DSL.quotedName(String)
orDSL.unquotedName(String)
instead.- [#10689] - 3.14.0 - This converter does not work. Do not use this method, useConverters.identity(Class)
instead.- [#10689] - 3.14.0 - This method does not provide any useful functionality and will be removed in the future.- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNext(int)
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#11902] - UseIterable.forEach(Consumer)
based methods, instead.- 3.15.0 - [#11902] - UseIterable.forEach(Consumer)
based methods, instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNext()
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNext(RecordMapper)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextInto(RecordHandler)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextInto(Class)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextInto(Table)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextOptional()
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextOptional(RecordMapper)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextOptionalInto(Class)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextOptionalInto(Table)
instead.- 3.20.0 - [#16810] - Static data type conversion has been a controversial historic feature of jOOQ. While occasionally useful for internal data types (such asString
toInteger
conversion, etc.) it doesn't work well with user defined types. 1) This method does not go throughConfiguration.converterProvider()
, 2) nor does it provide an appropriateConverterContext
to aContextConverter
, leading to subtle bugs. 3) It also doesn't make any guarantees related to what user defined types can be passed to it. This is why this method is deprecated and will be removed in a future jOOQ version. UseDataType.getConverter()
on this type, instead, and use that for data type conversions.- 3.20.0 - [#16810] - Static data type conversion has been a controversial historic feature of jOOQ. While occasionally useful for internal data types (such asString
toInteger
conversion, etc.) it doesn't work well with user defined types. 1) This method does not go throughConfiguration.converterProvider()
, 2) nor does it provide an appropriateConverterContext
to aContextConverter
, leading to subtle bugs. 3) It also doesn't make any guarantees related to what user defined types can be passed to it. This is why this method is deprecated and will be removed in a future jOOQ version. UseDataType.getConverter()
on this type, instead, and use that for data type conversions.- 3.20.0 - [#16810] - Static data type conversion has been a controversial historic feature of jOOQ. While occasionally useful for internal data types (such asString
toInteger
conversion, etc.) it doesn't work well with user defined types. 1) This method does not go throughConfiguration.converterProvider()
, 2) nor does it provide an appropriateConverterContext
to aContextConverter
, leading to subtle bugs. 3) It also doesn't make any guarantees related to what user defined types can be passed to it. This is why this method is deprecated and will be removed in a future jOOQ version. UseDataType.getConverter()
on this type, instead, and use that for data type conversions.- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#6280] - 3.10 - Do not reuse this method. It will be completely internal with jOOQ 4.0- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#6280] - 3.10 - Do not reuse this method. It will be completely internal with jOOQ 4.0- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.abs(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.acos(Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.ascii(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.asin(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.atan(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.atan2(Field, Number)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.atan2(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.avg(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.avg(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.bitLength(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.ceil(Field)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseField.touched(Record)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.charLength(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.coalesce(Field, Field...)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.coalesce(Object, Object...)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.cos(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.cosh(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.cot(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.coth(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.count(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.countDistinct(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.count(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.decode(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.decode(Field, Field, Field, Field...)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.decode(Object, Object, Object)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.decode(Object, Object, Object, Object...)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.deg(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.exp(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.extract(Field, DatePart)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.firstValue(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.floor(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.greatest(Field, Field...)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.greatest(Field, Field...)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lag(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lag(Field, int)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lag(Field, int, Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lag(Field, int, Object)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lastValue(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lead(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lead(Field, int)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lead(Field, int, Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lead(Field, int, Object)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.least(Field, Field...)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.least(Field, Field...)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.length(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.ln(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.log(Field, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.lower(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.lpad(Field, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.lpad(Field, int, char)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.lpad(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.lpad(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.ltrim(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.max(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.max(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.median(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.min(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.min(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.nullif(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.nullif(Field, Object)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.nvl(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.nvl(Field, Object)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.nvl2(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.nvl2(Field, Object, Object)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.octetLength(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.position(Field, String)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.position(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.rad(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.repeat(Field, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.repeat(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.replace(Field, String)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.replace(Field, String, String)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.replace(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.replace(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.round(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.round(Field, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.rpad(Field, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.rpad(Field, int, char)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.rpad(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.rpad(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.rtrim(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.sign(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.sin(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.sinh(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.sqrt(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.stddevPop(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.stddevPop(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.stddevSamp(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.stddevSamp(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.substring(Field, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.substring(Field, int, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.substring(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.substring(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.sum(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.sum(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.tan(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.tanh(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.trim(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.upper(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.varPop(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.varPop(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.varSamp(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.varSamp(Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- 3.11 - [#6631] - UseDefaultBinding.binding(Converter)
instead.- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.11.0 - [#7483] - The (indirect) use of the internal static data type registry is not recommended.- [#7956] - 3.12.0 - UseDSL.groupConcat(Field)
andGroupConcatSeparatorStep.separator(String)
instead.- [#15196] - 3.19.0 - The semantics of theField
arguments in this method is inconsistent with that of other overloads, such asDSL.jsonbObject(Field, Field)
, which can lead to subtle bugs. Please refrain from using this overload as it will be removed in the future. UseDSL.jsonObject(JSONEntry...)
instead.- [#15196] - 3.19.0 - The semantics of theField
arguments in this method is inconsistent with that of other overloads, such asDSL.jsonbObject(Field, Field)
, which can lead to subtle bugs. Please refrain from using this overload as it will be removed in the future. UseDSL.jsonObject(JSONEntry...)
instead.- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow1
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow10
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow11
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow12
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow13
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow14
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow15
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow16
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow17
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow18
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow19
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow2
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow20
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow21
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow22
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow3
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow4
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow5
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow6
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow7
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow8
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow9
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRowN
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- 3.10 - [#6162] - UseDSL.sequence(Name)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6162] - UseDSL.sequence(Name, Class)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6162] - UseDSL.sequence(Name, DataType)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#9404] - Please re-generate your code.org.jooq.impl.Internal.createForeignKey(UniqueKey<U>, Table<R>, String, TableField<R, ?>[], boolean) - 3.14.0 - [#9404] - Please re-generate your code.- 3.14.0 - [#9404] - Please re-generate your code.- 3.14.0 - [#9404] - Please re-generate your code.- 3.14.0 - [#9404] - Please re-generate your code.- [#11058] - 3.14.5 - Please re-generate your code.- [#12238] - 3.16.0 - Please re-generate your code.- [#12425] - 3.16.0 - Missing implementations should be added as soon as possible!- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- 3.14.0 - [#10010] - UseLoaderCSVStep.fieldsCorresponding()
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#10010] - UseLoaderJSONStep.fieldsCorresponding()
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#4941] - UseLoaderListenerStep.onRowEnd(LoaderRowListener)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#10010] - UseLoaderRowsStep.fieldsCorresponding()
instead.- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.12.0 - [#8163] - UsePivotForStep.for_(Field)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6143] - UseQueries.queryStream()
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched()
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(boolean)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(int)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(int, boolean)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(String)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(String, boolean)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(Field)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(Field, boolean)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(Name)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(Name, boolean)
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#11902] - UseIterable.forEach(Consumer)
based methods, instead.- 3.15.0 - [#11902] - UseIterable.forEach(Consumer)
based methods, instead.- 3.15.0 - [#11902] - UseIterable.forEach(Consumer)
based methods, instead.- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- 2.0.5 - Use runtime configurationSettings
instead[#5218] - 3.14.0 - UseSelectQuery.setForLockModeNoWait()
[#5218] - 3.14.0 - UseSelectQuery.setForLockModeOf(Collection)
[#5218] - 3.14.0 - UseSelectQuery.setForLockModeOf(Field...)
[#5218] - 3.14.0 - UseSelectQuery.setForLockModeOf(Table...)
[#5218] - 3.14.0 - UseSelectQuery.setForLockModeSkipLocked()
[#5218] - 3.14.0 - UseSelectQuery.setForLockModeWait(int)
- [#9403] - 3.13.0 - This dialect is hardly used by anyone with jOOQ or without jOOQ and will be removed in the near future.- [#17388] - 3.20.0 - This dialect is no longer supported. If you continue to require support for H2 1.4, please get in touch here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/17388- [#17388] - 3.20.0 - This dialect is no longer supported. If you continue to require support for H2 1.4, please get in touch here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/17388- [#12465] - 3.16.0 - This dialect is hardly used by anyone with jOOQ or without jOOQ and will be removed in the near future. If you're actively using this dialect, please get in touch for extended support: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/12465- [#11515] - 3.15.0 - This dialect is hardly used by anyone with jOOQ or without jOOQ and will be removed in the near future. If you're actively using this dialect, please get in touch for extended support: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/11515- [#11797] - 3.15.0 - This dialect is no longer supported. If you continue to require support for Oracle 10g, please get in touch here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/11797- [#17125] - 3.20.0 - This dialect is no longer supported. If you continue to require support for Oracle 11g, please get in touch here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/17125- [#17125] - 3.20.0 - This dialect is no longer supported. If you continue to require support for Oracle 12c, please get in touch here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/17125- [#17126] - 3.20.0 - This dialect is no longer supported. If you continue to require support for Oracle 12c, please get in touch here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/17126- [#9882] - 3.14.0 - UseSQLDialect.supportedBy(SQLDialect...)
instead- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.15.0 - [#11898] This class will be removed in the future. Do not reuse. Data type conversion happens using internalConverter
implementations, orConverterProvider
provided ones, or implementations attached to fields via generated code, or viaField.convert(Converter)
, orDataType.asConvertedDataType(Converter)
.- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.13.0 - [#9403] - This dialect is hardly used by anyone with jOOQ or without jOOQ and will be removed in the near future.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#12099] - MySQL 8.0.20 has deprecated this clause and replaced it by something new, which we'll support soon, see https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/insert-on-duplicate.html/ and https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/12099- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#8381] [#10641] - UseDSL.toChar(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#8381] [#10641] - UseDSL.toChar(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#8381] [#10641] - UseDSL.toChar(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#8381] [#10641] - UseDSL.toChar(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#8381] [#10641] - UseDSL.toChar(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#8381] [#10641] - UseDSL.toChar(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- [#12420] - 3.16.0 - Use actualOID
column references in jOOQ-meta, instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.
-
InterfaceDescription- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- 2.6.0 [#1881] - This type will be removed from the public API, soon. Its methods will be pushed down into extending interfaces. Do not reference this type directly.- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- 3.17.0 - [#13005] - Use
TableElement
instead.- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- 3.15.0 - [#11902] - UseIterable.forEach(Consumer)
based methods, instead.- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly- [#11329] - 3.15.0 - This type will be removed in the future. Do not reference it directly
-
ClassDescription- [#6875] [#7158] - 3.11.0 - Please re-generate your code- 3.15.0 - [#11505] - Use
Converter.ofNullable(Class, Class, Function, Function)
instead, e.g.Converter.ofNullable(Date.class, LocalDate.class, Date::toLocalDate, Date::valueOf)
.- 3.17.0 - [#13542] - This class is no longer needed. Implement theDiagnosticsListener
SPI directly, instead.- 3.17.0 - [#13542] - This class is no longer needed. Implement theExecuteListener
SPI directly, instead.- 3.17.0 - [#13542] - This class is no longer needed. Implement theMigrationListener
SPI directly, instead.- 3.17.0 - [#13542] - This class is no longer needed. Implement theParseListener
SPI directly, instead.- 3.17.0 - [#13542] - This class is no longer needed. Implement theRecordListener
SPI directly, instead.- 3.17.0 - [#13542] - This class is no longer needed. Implement theTransactionListener
SPI directly, instead.- 3.17.0 - [#13542] - This class is no longer needed. Implement theVisitListener
SPI directly, instead.- 3.15.0 - [#11505] - UseConverter.ofNullable(Class, Class, Function, Function)
instead, e.g.Converter.ofNullable(Timestamp.class, LocalDateTime.class, Timestamp::toLocalDateTime, Timestamp::valueOf)
.- 3.15.0 - [#11505] - UseConverter.ofNullable(Class, Class, Function, Function)
instead, e.g.Converter.ofNullable(Time.class, LocalTime.class, Time::toLocalTime, Time::valueOf)
.- 2.0.5 - Use runtime configurationSettings
instead- 3.15.0 - [#11898] This class will be removed in the future. Do not reuse. Data type conversion happens using internalConverter
implementations, orConverterProvider
provided ones, or implementations attached to fields via generated code, or viaField.convert(Converter)
, orDataType.asConvertedDataType(Converter)
.- 3.15.0 - [#11618] - This type is no longer used by jOOQ and will be removed in the future.- 3.15.0 - [#11618] - This type is no longer used by jOOQ and will be removed in the future.- 3.15.0 - [#11618] - This type is no longer used by jOOQ and will be removed in the future.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.13.0 - [#9403] - This dialect is hardly used by anyone with jOOQ or without jOOQ and will be removed in the near future.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.8.0 - [#4550] Do not reference this type directly.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#10796] - This class will be removed, soon, no more vendor specific DSL API will be added.- 3.11.0 - [#7375] - This type is part of jOOQ's internal API. Do not reference this type directly from client code. Referencing this type before theSQLDataType
class has been initialised may lead to deadlocks! See https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/3777 for details.Use the corresponding
SQLDataType
instead.
-
Enum ClassDescription- 3.11.0 - [#7258] - This part of the
VisitListener
SPI is deprecated. There are currently no plans of replacing it. Please get in touch if you think this functionality needs to be kept in one way or another: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/7258- UseLog.Level
instead
-
Exception ClassDescription- [#12425] - 3.16.0 - Missing implementations should be added as soon as possible!
-
Annotation InterfaceDescription- 3.17.0 - [#13071] - Use
ApiStatus.Internal
instead.
-
FieldDescription- use #expiration instead
-
MethodDescription- 3.14.0 - [#9911] - This method is no longer supported.- 3.14.0 - [#9911] - This method is no longer supported.- 3.14.0 - [#9911] - This method is no longer supported.- 3.12.0 - [#5909] - Use
RenderKeywordCase
instead.- 3.12.0 - [#5909] - UseRenderQuotedNames
andRenderNameCase
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14634] - The configuration of this transformation is deprecated. It will no longer be commercially available only, but apply also to the jOOQ Open Source Edition, when required.- 3.18.0 - [#13912] [#15316] - UseSettings.fetchTriggerValuesAfterReturning
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#13912] [#15316] - UseSettings.fetchTriggerValuesAfterReturning
instead.- 3.12.0 - [#5909] - UseRenderKeywordCase
instead.- 3.12.0 - [#5909] - UseRenderQuotedNames
andRenderNameCase
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14634] - The configuration of this transformation is deprecated. It will no longer be commercially available only, but apply also to the jOOQ Open Source Edition, when required.- 3.18.0 - [#13912] [#15316] - UseSettings.fetchTriggerValuesAfterReturning
instead.- 3.12.0 - [#5909] - UseRenderKeywordCase
instead.- 3.12.0 - [#5909] - UseRenderQuotedNames
andRenderNameCase
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14634] - The configuration of this transformation is deprecated. It will no longer be commercially available only, but apply also to the jOOQ Open Source Edition, when required.- 2.0.5 - UseConfiguration.settings()
instead- [#10317] - 3.14.0 - Do not reuse this method. It will be removed without replacement.- [#10317] - 3.14.0 - Do not reuse this method. It will be removed without replacement.- 3.10.0 - [#4990] - Use any ofDSL.name(String)
,DSL.quotedName(String)
orDSL.unquotedName(String)
instead.- [#10689] - 3.14.0 - This converter does not work. Do not use this method, useConverters.identity(Class)
instead.- [#10689] - 3.14.0 - This method does not provide any useful functionality and will be removed in the future.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNext(int)
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#11902] - UseIterable.forEach(Consumer)
based methods, instead.- 3.15.0 - [#11902] - UseIterable.forEach(Consumer)
based methods, instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNext()
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNext(RecordMapper)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextInto(RecordHandler)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextInto(Class)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextInto(Table)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextOptional()
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextOptional(RecordMapper)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextOptionalInto(Class)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6363] - UseCursor.fetchNextOptionalInto(Table)
instead.- 3.20.0 - [#16810] - Static data type conversion has been a controversial historic feature of jOOQ. While occasionally useful for internal data types (such asString
toInteger
conversion, etc.) it doesn't work well with user defined types. 1) This method does not go throughConfiguration.converterProvider()
, 2) nor does it provide an appropriateConverterContext
to aContextConverter
, leading to subtle bugs. 3) It also doesn't make any guarantees related to what user defined types can be passed to it. This is why this method is deprecated and will be removed in a future jOOQ version. UseDataType.getConverter()
on this type, instead, and use that for data type conversions.- 3.20.0 - [#16810] - Static data type conversion has been a controversial historic feature of jOOQ. While occasionally useful for internal data types (such asString
toInteger
conversion, etc.) it doesn't work well with user defined types. 1) This method does not go throughConfiguration.converterProvider()
, 2) nor does it provide an appropriateConverterContext
to aContextConverter
, leading to subtle bugs. 3) It also doesn't make any guarantees related to what user defined types can be passed to it. This is why this method is deprecated and will be removed in a future jOOQ version. UseDataType.getConverter()
on this type, instead, and use that for data type conversions.- 3.20.0 - [#16810] - Static data type conversion has been a controversial historic feature of jOOQ. While occasionally useful for internal data types (such asString
toInteger
conversion, etc.) it doesn't work well with user defined types. 1) This method does not go throughConfiguration.converterProvider()
, 2) nor does it provide an appropriateConverterContext
to aContextConverter
, leading to subtle bugs. 3) It also doesn't make any guarantees related to what user defined types can be passed to it. This is why this method is deprecated and will be removed in a future jOOQ version. UseDataType.getConverter()
on this type, instead, and use that for data type conversions.- [#6280] - 3.10 - Do not reuse this method. It will be completely internal with jOOQ 4.0- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#6280] - 3.10 - Do not reuse this method. It will be completely internal with jOOQ 4.0- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.abs(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.acos(Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.ascii(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.asin(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.atan(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.atan2(Field, Number)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.atan2(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.avg(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.avg(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.bitLength(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.ceil(Field)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseField.touched(Record)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.charLength(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.coalesce(Field, Field...)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.coalesce(Object, Object...)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.cos(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.cosh(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.cot(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.coth(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.count(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.countDistinct(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.count(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.decode(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.decode(Field, Field, Field, Field...)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.decode(Object, Object, Object)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.decode(Object, Object, Object, Object...)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.deg(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.exp(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.extract(Field, DatePart)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.firstValue(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.floor(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.greatest(Field, Field...)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.greatest(Field, Field...)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lag(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lag(Field, int)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lag(Field, int, Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lag(Field, int, Object)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lastValue(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lead(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lead(Field, int)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lead(Field, int, Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.lead(Field, int, Object)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.least(Field, Field...)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.least(Field, Field...)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.length(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.ln(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.log(Field, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.lower(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.lpad(Field, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.lpad(Field, int, char)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.lpad(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.lpad(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.ltrim(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.max(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.max(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.median(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.min(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.min(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.nullif(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.nullif(Field, Object)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.nvl(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.nvl(Field, Object)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.nvl2(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.nvl2(Field, Object, Object)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.octetLength(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.position(Field, String)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.position(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.rad(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.repeat(Field, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.repeat(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.replace(Field, String)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.replace(Field, String, String)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.replace(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.replace(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.round(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.round(Field, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.rpad(Field, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.rpad(Field, int, char)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.rpad(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.rpad(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.rtrim(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.sign(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.sin(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.sinh(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.sqrt(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.stddevPop(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.stddevPop(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.stddevSamp(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.stddevSamp(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.substring(Field, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.substring(Field, int, int)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.substring(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.substring(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.sum(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.sum(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.tan(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.tanh(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.trim(Field)
instead.- 3.13 - [#9407] - UseDSL.upper(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.varPop(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.varPop(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.varSamp(Field)
instead.- 3.11 - [#7538] - UseDSL.varSamp(Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- [#6875] [#7158] - 3.11.0 - Please re-generate your code- [#6875] [#7158] - 3.11.0 - Please re-generate your code- [#6875] [#7158] - 3.11.0 - Please re-generate your code- [#6875] [#7158] - 3.11.0 - Please re-generate your code- [#6875] [#7158] - 3.11.0 - Please re-generate your code- [#6875] [#7158] - 3.11.0 - Please re-generate your code- Please, re-generate your routine code.- Please, re-generate your routine code.- Please, re-generate your routine code.- Please, re-generate your routine code.- Please, re-generate your routine code.- Please, re-generate your routine code.- Please, re-generate your routine code.- Please, re-generate your routine code.- Please, re-generate your routine code.- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDefaultDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.11.0 - [#7483] - The (indirect) use of the internal static data type registry is not recommended.- [#7956] - 3.12.0 - UseDSL.groupConcat(Field)
andGroupConcatSeparatorStep.separator(String)
instead.- [#15196] - 3.19.0 - The semantics of theField
arguments in this method is inconsistent with that of other overloads, such asDSL.jsonbObject(Field, Field)
, which can lead to subtle bugs. Please refrain from using this overload as it will be removed in the future. UseDSL.jsonObject(JSONEntry...)
instead.- [#15196] - 3.19.0 - The semantics of theField
arguments in this method is inconsistent with that of other overloads, such asDSL.jsonbObject(Field, Field)
, which can lead to subtle bugs. Please refrain from using this overload as it will be removed in the future. UseDSL.jsonObject(JSONEntry...)
instead.- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSL.mergeInto(Table)
- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11092] - 3.15.0 - This method will be removed without public replacement.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow1
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow10
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow11
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow12
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow13
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow14
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow15
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow16
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow17
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow18
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow19
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow2
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow20
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow21
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow22
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow3
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow4
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow5
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow6
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow7
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow8
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRow9
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- [#11812] - 3.15.0 - UseRowN
as aSelectField
directly, instead.- 3.10 - [#6162] - UseDSL.sequence(Name)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6162] - UseDSL.sequence(Name, Class)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6162] - UseDSL.sequence(Name, DataType)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Regenerate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Regenerate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Regenerate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Regenerate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#9736] - Regenerate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#9736] - Regenerate your code.- 3.14.0 - [#9404] - Please re-generate your code.org.jooq.impl.Internal.createForeignKey(UniqueKey<U>, Table<R>, String, TableField<R, ?>[], boolean) - 3.14.0 - [#9404] - Please re-generate your code.- 3.14.0 - [#9404] - Please re-generate your code.- 3.14.0 - [#9404] - Please re-generate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Regenerate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Regenerate your code.- 3.14.0 - [#9404] - Please re-generate your code.- 3.14.0 - [#9404] - Please re-generate your code.- [#11058] - 3.14.5 - Please re-generate your code.- [#12238] - 3.16.0 - Please re-generate your code.- 3.12.0 - [#8000] - UseUDTImpl.createField(Name, DataType, UDT)
instead.- 3.12.0 - [#8000] - UseUDTImpl.createField(Name, DataType, UDT, String)
instead.- 3.12.0 - [#8000] - UseUDTImpl.createField(Name, DataType, UDT, String, Binding)
instead.- 3.12.0 - [#8000] - UseUDTImpl.createField(Name, DataType, UDT, String, Converter)
instead.- 3.12.0 - [#8000] - UseUDTImpl.createField(Name, DataType, UDT, String, Converter, Binding)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#10010] - UseLoaderCSVStep.fieldsCorresponding()
instead.- [#4859] - This is not supported for JSON loading.- 3.14.0 - [#10010] - UseLoaderJSONStep.fieldsCorresponding()
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#4941] - UseLoaderListenerStep.onRowEnd(LoaderRowListener)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#10010] - UseLoaderRowsStep.fieldsCorresponding()
instead.- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaDSLContext.mergeInto(Table)
- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.12.0 - [#8163] - UsePivotForStep.for_(Field)
instead.- 3.10 - [#6143] - UseQueries.queryStream()
instead.- CallingQueryPartInternal.accept(Context)
directly on aQueryPart
is almost always a mistake. Instead,Context.visit(QueryPart)
should be called.- CallingQueryPartInternal.rendersContent(Context)
directly on aQueryPart
is almost always a mistake.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched()
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(boolean)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(int)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(int, boolean)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(String)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(String, boolean)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(Field)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(Field, boolean)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(Name)
instead.- [#12494] - 3.20.0 - UseRecord.touched(Name, boolean)
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#11902] - UseIterable.forEach(Consumer)
based methods, instead.- 3.15.0 - [#11902] - UseIterable.forEach(Consumer)
based methods, instead.- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly[#5218] - 3.14.0 - UseSelectQuery.setForLockModeNoWait()
[#5218] - 3.14.0 - UseSelectQuery.setForLockModeOf(Collection)
[#5218] - 3.14.0 - UseSelectQuery.setForLockModeOf(Field...)
[#5218] - 3.14.0 - UseSelectQuery.setForLockModeOf(Table...)
[#5218] - 3.14.0 - UseSelectQuery.setForLockModeSkipLocked()
[#5218] - 3.14.0 - UseSelectQuery.setForLockModeWait(int)
- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#7461] - SEEK BEFORE is not implemented correctly- [#9882] - 3.14.0 - UseSQLDialect.supportedBy(SQLDialect...)
instead- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- UseMockFileDatabaseConfiguration.nullLiteral(String)
instead.- Experimental: Do not use. Subject to change.[#78] 0.9.11, useReflect.onClass(Class)
instead.[#78] 0.9.11, useReflect.onClass(String)
instead.[#78] 0.9.11, useReflect.onClass(String, ClassLoader)
instead.- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#8611] - This function has been removed from MySQL 8- 3.15.0 - [#12099] - MySQL 8.0.20 has deprecated this clause and replaced it by something new, which we'll support soon, see https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/insert-on-duplicate.html/ and https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/12099- 3.14.0 - [#8381] [#10641] - UseDSL.toChar(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#8381] [#10641] - UseDSL.toChar(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#8381] [#10641] - UseDSL.toChar(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#8381] [#10641] - UseDSL.toChar(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#8381] [#10641] - UseDSL.toChar(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.14.0 - [#8381] [#10641] - UseDSL.toChar(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayAppend(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayAppend(Field, Object)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayAppend(Object[], Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayAppend(Object[], Object)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayConcat(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayConcat(Field, Object[])
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayConcat(Object[], Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayConcat(Object[], Object[])
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14352] - UseDSL.arrayOverlap(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14352] - UseDSL.arrayOverlap(Field, Object[])
instead.- 3.16.0 - [#14352] - UseDSL.arrayOverlap(Object[], Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14352] - UseDSL.arrayOverlap(Object[], Object[])
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayPrepend(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayPrepend(Field, Object[])
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayPrepend(Object, Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayPrepend(Object, Object[])
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayRemove(Field, Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayRemove(Field, Object)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayRemove(Object[], Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#14388] - UseDSL.arrayRemove(Object[], Object)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#11981] - UseDSL.arrayReplace(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#11981] - UseDSL.arrayReplace(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#11981] - UseDSL.arrayReplace(Field, Field, Field)
instead.- 3.18.0 - [#11981] - UseDSL.arrayReplace(Object[], Object, Object)
instead.- [#12420] - 3.16.0 - Use actualOID
column references in jOOQ-meta, instead.- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- [#10045] - 3.14.0 - Use the standard SQL MERGE API instead, viaWithStep.mergeInto(Table)
- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.- 3.14.0 - [#10156] - These methods will be removed without replacement from a future jOOQ. They offer convenience that is unidiomatic for jOOQ's DSL, without offering functionality that would not be possible otherwise - yet they add complexity in jOOQ's internals.
-
ConstructorDescription- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Re-generate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Re-generate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Re-generate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Re-generate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Re-generate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Re-generate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Re-generate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Re-generate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Re-generate your code.- 3.20.0 - [#15723] - Re-generate your code.- 3.10 - [#5996] - Use
CustomTable(Name)
instead.- 3.10 - [#5996] - UseCustomTable(Name, Schema)
instead.- 3.11 - [#6631] - UseDefaultBinding.binding(Converter)
instead.- [#11058] - 3.14.5 - Please re-generate your code.- [#11058] - 3.14.5 - Please re-generate your code.- 3.10 - [#5996] - UseTableImpl(Name)
instead (or re-generated your code).- 3.10 - [#5996] - UseTableImpl(Name, Schema)
instead (or re-generated your code).- 3.10 - [#5996] - UseTableImpl(Name, Schema, Table)
instead (or re-generated your code).- 3.10 - [#5996] - UseTableImpl(Name, Schema, Table, Field[])
instead (or re-generated your code).- 3.10 - [#5996] - UseTableImpl(Name, Schema, Table, Field[], String)
instead (or re-generated your code).- [#8012] - 3.19.0 - Please re-generate your code.- [#13639] [#14985] [#15005] - 3.19.0 - Please re-generate your code.- [#13639] [#14985] [#15005] - 3.19.0 - Please re-generate your code.- 3.11 - [#7027] - UseTableImpl(Name, Schema, Table, Field[], Comment)
instead.- [#13639] [#14985] [#15005] - 3.19.0 - Please re-generate your code.- [#15583] - 3.19.0 - Please re-generate your code.- [#15583] - 3.19.0 - Please re-generate your code.- [#15583] - 3.19.0 - Please re-generate your code.- [#15050] - 3.19.0 - Do not construct your own logger. UseJooqLogger.getLogger(Class)
methods instead.
-
Enum ConstantDescription- [#9403] - 3.13.0 - This dialect is hardly used by anyone with jOOQ or without jOOQ and will be removed in the near future.- [#17388] - 3.20.0 - This dialect is no longer supported. If you continue to require support for H2 1.4, please get in touch here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/17388- [#17388] - 3.20.0 - This dialect is no longer supported. If you continue to require support for H2 1.4, please get in touch here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/17388- [#12465] - 3.16.0 - This dialect is hardly used by anyone with jOOQ or without jOOQ and will be removed in the near future. If you're actively using this dialect, please get in touch for extended support: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/12465- [#11515] - 3.15.0 - This dialect is hardly used by anyone with jOOQ or without jOOQ and will be removed in the near future. If you're actively using this dialect, please get in touch for extended support: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/11515- [#11797] - 3.15.0 - This dialect is no longer supported. If you continue to require support for Oracle 10g, please get in touch here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/11797- [#17125] - 3.20.0 - This dialect is no longer supported. If you continue to require support for Oracle 11g, please get in touch here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/17125- [#17125] - 3.20.0 - This dialect is no longer supported. If you continue to require support for Oracle 12c, please get in touch here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/17125- [#16628] - 3.20.0 - Use
SQLDialect.ORACLE23AI
instead.- This dialect is not yet supported by jOOQ.- [#17126] - 3.20.0 - This dialect is no longer supported. If you continue to require support for Oracle 12c, please get in touch here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/17126